CITY BOARD 8
May 2001
(6pm – 7.40pm)
PRESENT: Councillor Howarth (Chair), Councillors
Bagnall, Currie, Durrant, Harrison, Nimmo-Smith, Reed, C.Rosenstiel, Slatter,
Stuart, Talbot and Taylor. The Mayor
(Ex-officio)
FOR ADOPTION BY THE
COUNCIL
01/A/24 APPOINTMENT
OF COMMITTEES 2001/2002
The Board considered the size and membership of Committees
for the forthcoming municipal year bearing in mind the requirements that the
membership must be politically balanced in accordance with the Local Government
and Housing Act 1989 and that the Council should appoint ‘parent’ committees,
who would then appoint their sub committees.
Councillor Bagnall stated that the size of committees should be
increased to reflect more fairly the proportion of Labour members on the
Council. The Chair stated that the current size of committees had worked
well and was in accordance with the three principles which the Council was
legally required to take into account when allocating committee places.
Council is
recommended (by 7 votes to
4)
That the size and
membership of committees in 2001/2002 be as follows:
|
COMMITTEE |
LIB DEM |
LABOUR |
CONSERVATIVE |
|
CITY BOARD 12 |
Howarth C Rosenstiel Harrison Knowles Nimmo-Smith Slatter Smart (A – J
Rosenstiel) |
Bagnall Bradnack Durrant Reed |
Stuart (A- Douglas) |
|
ENVIRONMENT 10 |
Harrison Dixon Howarth Slatter White Ward (A-
Woodford) |
Bradnack Durrant Johnston |
Douglas (A – Howell) |
|
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AND LEISURE 10 |
J Rosenstiel Knowles Ellis-Miller Levison M Schofield Taylor (A – Hipkin) |
Benstead Callaghan Reed Talbot |
- |
|
HOUSING AND
HEALTH 10 |
Nimmo-Smith Griffiths James Liddle Smart Stebbings (A- Currie) |
Bagnall Gilchrist Overhill |
Howell (A- Stuart) |
(A = Alternate member)
01/A/25 APPOINTMENT TO OTHER BODIES
Council is
recommended (with no
votes against)
That the following appointments be made at the meeting of
Council on 17 May 2001:
1) Cambridge Environment and Transport
Area Joint Committee (5 City Council members): Councillors Blencowe, Harrison,
Howarth, Johnston and C. Rosenstiel.
2) Council Tax/Housing Benefits Review
Board (10 members): Councillors Bradnack, Callaghan, Dixon, Dryden, Griffiths,
James, Johnston, Nimmo-Smith, Smart, Stebbings.
3) (By 7 votes to 0) That Councillor Smart
be appointed as Chair of the Council Tax/Housing Benefits Review Board.
01/A/26 APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRS & VICE-CHAIRS
The Chair proposed the Chairs/Vice-Chairs listed in the
table below.
Councillor Bagnall nominated Councillors Blencowe and T.
Schofield for Chairs of Planning and Licensing Sub-Committees
respectively. Councillor Bagnall stated
that these nominations had been made because both Sub-Committees’ functions and
decision-making powers were non-political.
Councillors Slatter and Nimmo-Smith stated that the Chair of Planning
Sub-Committee would be required to oversee the Best Value Action Plan for
Development Control, which may require policy and resourcing decisions to be
taken, and therefore the Chair should be a Liberal Democrat councillor. The Chair agreed with this view, but
suggested that the Liberal Democrat Group would re-consider whether the
Vice-Chair of Licensing Sub-Committee needed to be a Liberal Democrat councillor.
On a vote of 4 in favour and 7 against, the nominations from
Councillor Bagnall were not agreed.
|
|
CHAIR |
VICE-CHAIR |
City Board
|
Howarth |
C Rosenstiel |
Community Dev. & Leisure
|
J. Rosenstiel |
Knowles |
Environment
|
Harrison |
Dixon |
Housing & Health
|
Nimmo-Smith |
Griffiths |
|
|
|
|
Property & Admin S/Cttee
|
Taylor |
Lakin |
City Centre Development S/Cttee
|
C Rosenstiel |
Dixon |
Periodic Electoral Review & Local
Govt. Act S/Cttee
|
Howarth |
C Rosenstiel |
|
|
|
|
Planning S/Cttee
|
Slatter |
Smart |
Licensing S/Cttee
|
Knowles |
J. Rosenstiel |
Environment & Planning Policy
S/Cttee
|
Howarth |
Harrison |
Council is recommended
(by 7 votes to 0)
To agree the appointment of Chairs and Vice Chairs for
2001/2002 as listed in the above table.
01/A/27 CONVENTIONS 2001/2002
The Board agreed to some minor amendments to the current
Conventions in A4(2), B1, B2 and D3 (these are highlighted and the Coventions
are appended to the minutes).
Councillor Bagnall refered to B2 and requested that the
circulating of draft papers and briefing spokes should take place before
issuing final papers. The Chair noted
that wherever practicable this was the case and asked that the Committee
Section monitor the situation during the year.
Council is
recommended
To agree to adopt the Conventions appended for 2001/02.
01/28/A LOCAL
GOVERNMENT ACT – SETTING UP A STANDARDS COMMITTEE AND MEMBERS’ REMUNERATION
PANEL
The Board considered a report (appended to these minutes) which outlined the requirement under the Local Government Act 2000 for local authorities to establish a Standards Committee and a non-councillor Panel to advise the Council on members’ remuneration allowances. The Board noted that both these new bodies would need to be in place prior to the introduction of the new decision making structures in May 2002.
During discussion on the report it was agreed that the term
‘independent member’ which referred to the fact that the committee required a
membership quota of non-councillors should be changed as the Council can on
occasion have Independent Members of the Council.
Councillor Knowles requested that the report be amended to
reflect the fact that Chloe Cockerill was no longer Manager of the Cambridge
Citizens’ Advice Bureau (para 4.7 refers).
1)
To approve the
draft Terms of Reference for the Standards Committee as appended to these
minutes.
2)
That the
membership of the Committee totals 8, initially made up of 3 Liberal Democrats,
2 Labour, 1 Conservative and 2 non-councillors and that the option for an
Executive Member to be on the Standards Committee be considered in May 2002.
3)
That a
Selection Panel of 4 (2 Lib Dem,1 Lab, 1 Con) members determine the selection
process for non-councillors and recommend appointments to Council. The
Board noted that there will be a requirement
for a special Council meeting on 13 September to consider the Selection
Panel’s recommendations.
Regarding
the Remuneration Panel:
4)
That oversight
of the panel on members’ remuneration and decisions on how it operates be
delegated to the Periodic Electoral Review & Local Government Act
Sub-Committee.
5)
That the Council
advertises openly for candidates to the Panel.
6)
That the Panel
appoints its own Chair.
7)
That the
Panel’s Term of Office be 3 years and renewable by agreement between the
Council and each Panel member.
8)
That the
Sub-Committee decide whether the Panel receives an allowance guided by the
current principles applied to the rate at which members’ allowances are set and
the practices followed in a selection of other local authorites.
01/A/29 AMENDMENTS TO DELEGATIONS
The departmental restructuring last year led to a transfer of responsibilities from the previous structure to the Directors of Central Services, Community Services and Environment and Planning. There has also been a restructuring of responsibilities at second tier level within directorates.
The Council’s formal scheme of delegation identifies officers at first and second tier level who may exercise powers and discharge duties on behalf of the Council. It is implicit within the restructuring that responsibility for exercising the delegations follows the transfer of responsibilities. Accordingly,
Council is recommended
To confirm that the Directors of Central Services, Community Services and Environment & Planning, and second tier officers within those directorates, may exercise all of the powers and discharge all the duties identified in the Council’s scheme of delegation which relate to service areas for which they are responsible.
CITY BOARD 8
May 2001
(6pm – 7.40pm)
PRESENT: Councillor Howarth (Chair), Councillors
Bagnall, Currie, Durrant, Harrison, Nimmo-Smith, Reed, C.Rosenstiel, Slatter,
Stuart, Talbot and Taylor. The Mayor
(Ex-officio)
FOR INFORMATION OF
THE COUNCIL
01/a/30 MINUTES
Councillor Taylor stated that under 01/a/26 her interest
should be ‘as her partner was a contractor for the Bank of New York.’ Subject to that amendment the minutes were
signed by the Chair as a correct record.
01/a/31 APPOINTMENT OF COMMITTEES 2001/2002
(see also 01/A/24)
The Board was advised that as Labour Group totalled 15
members (following Councillor Mbaya’s resignation from the Group) the ratio per
political group for those Sub-Committees with 10 members for 2001/02 would be 6
Lib Dem, 3 Lab, 1 Conservative. It was
noted the numbers of other sub-committees were not affected.
Resolved (by 7 votes to 4)
1) The City
Board Sub-Committees should comprise the following:
|
|
Liberal Democrat seats |
Labour seats |
Conservative seats |
|
Property & Administration – 10 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
|
City Centre Development – 6 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
|
Periodical Electoral Review & Local Government
Act – 6 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
2) That parent committees be advised on
the size of sub-committees as follows:
|
|
Liberal Democrat seats |
Labour seats |
Conservative seats |
|
Planning – 10 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
|
Licensing – 6 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
|
Environment & Planning Policy – 8 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
3) To disband the IT Procurement and Best Value Fundamental Service Review Sub-Committee.
01/a/32 WORKING PARTIES
Councillor Bagnall requested that the Labour Group
representation on Direct Services Management Board and Office Accommodation
Working Party be increased by one. The
proposal was lost by 5 votes to 7.
The Board agreed that the Service Improvement Panel should
not be re-appointed as it had not met for two years (since its inception). However, this decision was taken on the
understanding that the Best Value Review of Revenue Services was due to
commence which in itself would require member participation.
Resolved (by 7 votes to 0)
1) That the number of seats for City Board working parties are as follows:
Chief
Officer Appraisal Working Party (6)
City
University Forum (APU) (4)
City
University Forum (University of Cambridge) (2)
Direct
Services Management Board (6)
E-Government
(8)
Fundamental
Service Review and Audit Working Party (8)
Joint
Staff Employer Forum (6)
Periodic Electoral Review (7)
2) That committees are advised of the size
of working parties as follows:
Appointed by Environment Committee |
Size |
|
Addenbrookes
NHS/City/SCDC Joint Working Party |
3 |
|
Cambridge City/South Cambs Environment &
Transport Area Strategic Forum |
4 |
|
City
Centre Management Consultative Forum |
2 |
|
Development
Plan Steering Group |
8 |
|
Sustainable
City Executive Group |
2 |
|
Appointed by Housing & Health Committee |
Size |
|
Housing
Performance Monitoring Panel |
5 |
|
Appointed by Property & Administration Sub-Committee |
Size |
|
Office
Accommodation Working Party |
6 |
01/a/33 LOCAL
GOVERNMENT ACT – SUBMISSION OF CONSTITUTION TO SECRETARY OF STATE
Under the guidance issued by
Government, a local authority under normal circumstances should send its
proposals for the operation of executive arrangements to the DETR by the end of
June. This is irrespective of when the
new arrangements are to be implemented (the Council has agreed to implement in
May 2002).
The Board noted that the main components of the proposals will include:
·
a
statement of which form of executive is proposed
·
a
description of the roles of the executive, Council and scrutiny
·
the
consultation which took place, the outcome and how it is reflected in the
proposal
To comply with the Government’s timetable, the Board decided that the Periodic Electoral Review & Local Government Act Sub-Committee agree the content of the Council’s proposals for submission to the Secretary of State in June. The submission would be on the basis that the proposals were subject to Council approval on 19 July.
That the Periodic Electoral Review & Local Government
Act Sub-Committee be authorized to agree the Council’s proposals for submission
to the Secretary of State because of the reasons stated above.
01/a/34 APPOINTMENTS TO OUTSIDE BODIES
The officers
had been requested by the Chair of City Board to write to all outside bodies to
which the Council appoints observers with a view to establish whether observer
status was the preferred status for the local authority representative. All but one of those contacted which replied
indicated that the current practice was satisfactory. The Citizen’s Advice Bureau expressed a preference for a voting
member rather than observer.
In July 1997,
the Council adopted a policy regarding representation on outside bodies. Where
the Council decided to appoint a representative to an outside body, it would
generally appoint an observer, rather than nominate to membership. Three
exceptions to this approach were identified:
·
Organisations on which the Council was a member in its own
right – e.g. the National Local Government association and LGIU;
·
Public sector consultative or planning bodies such as the
Police Consultative Group, and JCC;
·
Representatives on school governing bodies (because of the
relevant legal framework).
The Chair
stated that the current policy was too rigid and suggested that committees
should be given the flexibility to consider requests from outside bodies for a
voting member. Councillors Bagnall and
Reed were concerned that the departure from the current policy of observer-only
status would be confusing and could place members in a position of conflict of
roles and responsibilities. Members
agreed that the Head of Legal & Democratic Services be asked to arrange for
a briefing note on ‘The Councillor’s role on outside bodies’.
Resolved – (by 7 votes to 4)
That committees are given the flexibility to consider
requests from outside bodies for the Council’s representative to be a voting
member rather than an observer.
01/a/35 ATTENDANCE REPORT
The Board noted a tabled report on Councillor attendance at
committee, sub-committee and working party meetings in 2000/01. It was requested that the Cambridge Area
Joint Committee be included in the figures.
The Board was advised that the table would be updated to include
meetings up to and including 16 May.
The meeting ended at 7.40pm