17 January 2001
(9.30am – 4.25pm)
PRESENT: Councillors Slatter (Chair), Blencowe, Cowell, Dryden,
Harrison, Hipkin, Nimmo-Smith, M Schofield, Smart, Smith.
|
FOR
THE INFORMATION OF THE COUNCIL |
01/j/1 Minutes
Confirmation of the minutes of 15 November
was deferred until the next meeting.
01/j/2 Apologies
There were no apologies for absence.
01/j/3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Nimmo-Smith declared a pecuniary
interest in relation to Tree Works Application TWA/223/00 as an employee of the Medical Research Council and left the room for the duration of
discussion of the item.
Code
of Conduct (non-financial) interests were declared as follows:
Councillor
Cowell, in relation to application
C/00/0817, Land to rear of 52 Beche Road, as he was known to the applicant.
Councillor
Dryden, in relation to application
C/00/1068, City Haven Guest House, as he was known to the applicant’s husband.
Councillor
Hipkin, in relation to application
C/00/1151, 49 New Square, as he
was a friend of the applicants.
Councillor
Nimmo-Smith, in relation to
application C/00/1038, 38A George Street, as he was known to the applicants.
01/j/4 Planning
Applications
A summary of decisions on applications for planning consent is set out in the appendix to these minutes. Full details of the decisions, conditions of permissions and reasons for refusals may be inspected in the Environment and Planning Department.
Resolved that
01/j/5 BVFSR OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL - FINAL REPORT
The report by the Director of Environment and Planning summarised the findings of the Best Value Inspection Report on the Development Control Service and set out the Action Plan for continuous improvement.
The report would subsequently also be considered by the Best Value Fundamental Services Review and Audit Working Party and the Environment Committee.
The service was the first in the country to have been inspected and it was felt that the award of two stars was a significant achievement which compared well with other reviews carried out nationally. The report went on to respond in detail to the Final Report and drew conclusions on the matters which had been highlighted in the recommendations. The appendices to the report listed the Action Plan and service improvements arising from the Action Plan which were considered to be priorities for achievement in 2001/2002.
The Inspection Report, among the other recommendations, had drawn attention to the need for additional resources, which had been taken into account in the budget setting process.
Members reviewed the Action Plan and commented on:
Resolved that
01/j/6 OBJECTION TO TREE
WORKS APPLICATION – 1 NORWICH STREET, TWA/223/00
The report by the Director of Environment and Planning reported that an objection had been received to a Conservation Area Notification to fell one sycamore tree at 1 Norwich Street. On inspection the tree was not currently causing structural damage to the walls to which it abutted; however, it was likely, during growth to exert lateral pressure on one or both walls, leading to collapse. The tree is acknowledged to have significant amenity value, which was the basis for the objection by a neighbour to its loss, but continued growth would lead to damage to the boundary walls. The applicant had undertaken to replace the tree with a more suitable specie in a more appropriate position.
Resolved that no objection
be made to the felling of one sycamore at 1 Norwich Street.
01/j/7 OBJECTION TO TREE WORKS APPLICATION – 15 CHAUCER ROAD, TWA/242/00
Under the Public Speaking Rights adopted by the Council at meetings of the Subcommittee, Dr H Pritchard, a local resident, spoke on this application.
The report by the Director of Environment and Planning reported that an objection had been received to a Notification to fell one conifer tree at 15 Chaucer Road. The reason for the removal of the tree was that it blocked light to the building and obstructed access to part of the garden.
On inspection, the tree was found to be a mature spruce growing in close proximity to a new extension in which the light levels were reduced by the dark, year-round canopy. Planning permission for the extension, granted in May 2000, had incorporated the removal of trees necessary to allow construction; the spruce had not been identified in that permission and a condition had protected trees on the site during construction to protect the visual amenity of the area and ensure their long term retention. The specie was not long lived in the eastern side of the country as, generally, conditions were too dry.
The tree’s removal would not have a significant impact on the character of the area although it would reduce screening from 17 Chaucer Road.
A further Notification had been received for the felling of several more trees on the site, on the grounds of their poor condition and the need to facilitate the rebuilding of a dangerous boundary wall. The consultation period on this Notification had not yet expired.
Members were concerned that the visual amenity should be protected, although the reasons given by the applicant were accepted. The applicant had suggested the replacement of the tree with a more suitable specie and in a more appropriate location to take account of the neighbour’s comment on the removal of screening and effect on the visual amenity.
Resolved that
A tree preservation order be made under the Town and Country Planning (Trees) Regulations, 1999 relating to the Spruce tree adjacent to the new extension on the basis that this would provide the opportunity for a replacement landscape to be planted and established to provide similar visual amenity and allow the subsequent removal of the spruce.
Councillor Nimmo-Smith declared a pecuniary
interest as an employee of
the Medical Research Council, the applicants, and left the room for the duration of the discussion of the item.
01/j/8 GUIDANCE FOR THE
INTERPRETATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF OPEN SPACE STANDARDS
The report by the Director of Environment and Planning updated the guidance adopted by the subcommittee in January 2000 for interpreting and implementing the Council’s Open Space Standards.
Resolved that:
01/j/9 ROOF EXTENSION DESIGN
GUIDE
The report by the Director of Environment and Planning responded to the need for Supplementary Planning Guidance which gave clear advice to the public before the submission of planning and other applications for minor alterations to properties. This was identified in the Cambridge Local Plan and highlighted by the Best Value Inspection Report on the Development Control Service. In particular the increase in number of applications for loft conversions had often proved controversial and led to debate at the Subcommittee.
Resolved that the Roof Extensions Design Guide be approved as supplementary planning guidance, following consultation on final details with the Chair and Spokesperson.
Appendix
PLANNING
SUBCOMMITTEE
17
January 2001
1
No: C/00/1221/FP
Site: Depot
adjacent to The Junction, Clifton Road, Cambridge
Proposal: Temporary
change of use from warehouse (formerly Pickfords) (Class B8) to winter night
shelter (sui generis) from 19 January 2001 to 31 March 2001.
Applicant: English
Churches Housing Group
Withdrawn
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
No: C/00/1053/FP
Site: 21-25
Union Lane, Cambridge, CB4 1PR
Proposal: Erection
of 9 two bedroom houses and 2 one bedroom houses on existing workshop site and
conversion of part of existing site office to residential use (remainder of
office to be demolished).
Applicant: M.O.I.L
REFUSED (by 8 votes to 0) on the following
grounds:
And the applicants attention was to be drawn to the following informatives:
1.
Any subsequent
application to be checked to ensure that the application form and plans are not
contradictory and adequately describe the proposal; Paras 16 and A4 of PPG1
General Policy and Principles (1997) encourage applicants to take account of
urban design in their proposals and submit a statement setting out the design principles adopted.
3. In relation to the desk top study for possible contamination, the relevant guidance listed should be referred to.
4. Because of the variety of buildings present, there was the possibility of asbestos material being present in the building fabric, the removal of any asbestos material should be undertaken in accordance with the appropriate Regulations and Codes of Practice regarding health and safety.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
No: C/00/0182/RM
Site: Former Philips/Unicam site, 130 York
Street, Cambridge, CB1 2PX
Proposal: Erection
of 4 4-bed houses, 74 3-bed houses, 8 2-bed houses, 54 2-bed flats and 92 1-bed
flats creating a total of 232 new dwelling units in 2 storey to 3-4 storey form
plus basement (Class C3)
Applicant: Wilcon
Homes Anglia
PSR: Under the Public Speaking Rights adopted by the
Council at meetings of the Subcommittee,
Mrs B Howard-Smith, a local resident, and Mr B Fill, agent for the
applicant, spoke on this application. At the invitation of the Chair Mrs G
Mallyon, a local resident, also spoke on the application to clarify a specific
objection relating to the proximity of the proposed buildings to the boundary..
REFUSED on the grounds set out on the sheet annexed to these minutes, following consultation with the Chair and Spokesperson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
No: C/00/0183/RM
- This application is a duplicate of C/00/0182, see above.
Site: Former
Philips/Unicam Site, 130 York Street, Cambridge, CB1 2PX
Proposal: Erection
of 4 4-bed houses, 74 3-bed houses, 8 2-bed houses, 54 2-bed flats and 92 1-bed
flats creating a total of 232 new dwelling units in 2 storey to 3-4 storey form
plus basement (Class C3).
Applicant: Wilcon
Homes Anglia
REFUSED on the grounds set out on the sheet annexed to these minutes, following consultation with the Chair and Spokesperson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5
No: C/00/0817/FP
Site: Land
to the rear of, 52 Beche Road, Cambridge, CB5 8HU
Proposal: Erection
of six terraced houses following the demolition of the existing buildings.
Applicant: Dean
& Dean
Fulbourn,
Cambridge
D of I: Councillor Cowell, as
he was known to the applicant.
APPROVE (by 8 votes to 1) subject to the following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Full Permissions (CO1)
2.
Materials samples
(C11)
3. Sample Panel (C15)
4.
Provision and
retention of Car Parking (C21)
5.
Hard and Soft
Landscape Works (C31)
6.
Boundary Treatment
(implementation before occupation) (C37A)
8.
Details of planting
implementation (Trees) (C53)
9.
Replacement Trees
and Shrubs (C54)
10. Construction Hours (C63)
11. Details of Contractors operations (C64)
12. Permitted Development Restriction (extensions)
(C80)
13. Permitted Development Exclusion (windows or
dormers) (C81)
And the following Informative:
1.
Roadway to include
features to ensure safety of pedestrian and vehicular traffic
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6
No: C/00/0969/FP
Site: Stourbridge
House, Riverside, Cambridge, CB5 8EY
Proposal: Replacement
of existing flat roof with pitched roof.
Applicant: Stourbridge
House Residents As
C/o
Januarys Chartered Surveyors
PSR: Under
the Public Speaking Rights adopted by the Council at meetings of the
Subcommittee, Ms M J Careyette, a local
resident, spoke on the application.
APPROVE (by 8 votes to 1) subject to the following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Full Permissions (CO1)
2.
Materials samples
(C11)
3.
Permitted Development
Exclusion (windows or dormers) (C81A)
4.
Construction Hours
(C63)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
No: C/00/1011/FP
Site: 30
Gwydir Street, Cambridge, CB1 2LL
Proposal: Erection
of building to incorporate garage, study and storage for residential use within
the same planning unit, and ancillary to No34 Gwydir Street.
Applicant: J M
Blakemore
WITHDRAWN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8
No: C/00/1046/FP
Site: Islamic
Centre, adjacent to, 1 Mawson Road, Cambridge, CB1 2DZ
Proposal: Extension
to mosque at rear to form enlargened assembly room - to replace building
recently demolished.
Applicant: Mr
Malik, Abubakrsiddiq Islamic Centre
APPROVED (by 6 votes to 0) subject to the following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Full Permissions (CO1)
2.
Construction Hours
(C63)
And the following
informatives:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9
No: C/00/1068/OP
Site: City
Haven Guest House, 20 St Margarets Square, Cambridge, CB1 4AP
Proposal: Outline
application for demolition of existing guest house and redevelopment of one
building containing 11 flats and 2 bungalows.
Applicant: Mrs T
Parkins
D of I: Councillor Dryden, as
he was known to the applicant’s husband.
APPROVED (by 8 votes to 0) subject to satisfactory completion of a Section 106 Agreement with the following Heads of Terms:
And the following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Outline Permissions (CO4)
2.
Reserved Matters
details (CO5)
3.
Materials samples
(C11)
4. Sample Panel (C15)
5.
Hard and Soft
Landscape works (customised version) (C31A)
6.
Landscape works
maintenance (C34)
7.
Parking, loading,
turning provision (C20)
10. Boundary Treatment (implementation before use
commences) (C37)
11. Permitted Development Restriction (extensions)
(C80)
12. Construction Hours (C63)
13. Details of Contractors operations (C64)
15. Permitted Development Exclusion (windows or
dormers) (C81)
And the following informatives:
5.
Section 106
obligation (AI04)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10
No: C/00/1061/FP
Site: 47
High Street, Trumpington, Cambridge
Proposal: Two
storey side extension to existing office.
Applicant: Mr
& Mrs G A Laurie
APPROVED (by 8 votes to 0) subject to the
following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Full Permissions (CO1)
2.
Materials samples
(C11)
3. Cycle Parking (CO22)
5.
Construction Hours
(C63)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
No: C/00/1153/FP
Site: Murkett
Brothers Ltd, 137 Histon Road, Cambridge, CB4 3JD
Proposal: Change
of use of garden to rear of 129 Histon Road to vehicular parking in association
with motor dealership and creation of new window to offices within Parts
Department.
Applicant: Murkett
Brothers Limited
APPROVED (by 8 votes to 0) subject to the following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Full Permissions (CO1)
2.
Matching materials
(extensions) (C13)
3.
Provision and retention
of Car Parking (C21)
4. Cycle Parking (CO22)
9.
Landscape works
maintenance (C34)
10. Hard and Soft Landscape implementation (C35)
11. Boundary Treatment (implementation before use
commences) (C37)
12. Floodlighting details (C38)
14. Tree Protection (C55)
15. Noise Insulation (C62)
16. Construction Hours (C63)
17. Details of Contractors operations (C64)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12
No: C/00/0723/FP
Site: 8
Market Passage, Cambridge, CB2 3QR
Proposal: Conversion
of existing building into a mixed wine bar and leisure use with new residential
accommodation for manager and staff.
Applicant: McMullen
& Sons Ltd
Councillor Harrison’s proposal that an
additional condition to limit the hours limiting overflow use of the of the
first floor area to Friday and Saturday evenings was lost by 2 votes to 6.
APPROVED (by 9 votes to 0) subject to satisfactory completion of a Section 106 Agreement with the following Heads of Terms:
And the following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Full Permissions (CO1)
2.
Materials samples
(C11)
4.
Cycle parking
(numbers to be specified) (C22A)
9.
Fume
Filtration/Extraction (C60)
10. Noise Insulation (C62)
11. Construction Hours (C63)
And the following informatives
9. Particular attention will need to be paid to the structure between the residential accommodation and the pub to ensure they are not adversely affected by noise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13
No: C/00/0985/VC
Site: 39B
Burleigh Street, Cambridge, CB1 1DG
Proposal: Removal
of condition 3 on approval C/0857/87 to extend opening hours to allow 24 hour
opening, 7 days per week.
Applicant: WTs
Snooker & Sporting Club
APPROVED (by 9 votes to 0) subject to the following conditions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14
No: C/00/1151/FP
Site: 49
New Square, Cambridge, CB1 1EZ
Proposal: Change
of use from residential to mixed residential (103sqm) and learner centre
(51sqm) use.
Applicant: C M H
Herbert
D of I: Councillor Hipkin, as
he was a friend of the applicants.
APPROVED (by 9 votes to 0) subject to the following conditions:
And the following informatives:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15
No: C/99/1231/FP
Site: Cycle
Bridge at, Coton Footpath and, Clerk Maxwell Road, Cambridge
Proposal: The
erection of a pedestrian and cycle bridge (3.8m wide x 4.0m long) to link Clerk
Maxwell Road to Coton Footpath.
Applicant: Cambridge
University
PSR: Under
the Public Speaking Rights adopted by the Council at meetings of the
Subcommittee, Mr W Papworth (on behalf
of Dr M Griffin), a local resident, and Mr M Bienias, on behalf of the
applicant spoke on the application.
APPROVED (by 8 votes to 0)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16
No: C/00/1038/OP
Site: 38A
George Street, Cambridge, CB4 1AJ
Proposal: Outline
permission for the erection of a chalet bungalow to the rear of 38a George
Street.
Applicant: Mr M
Polito
D of I: Councillor Nimmo-Smith, as
he was known to the applicants.
RefuseD: on the
following grounds
1.
The proposal is
unacceptable in that the size and siting of the plot would result in a cramped
form of development which would be out of character with this part of George
Street and Herbert Street, and would have an unneighbourly impact on the
amenity space to the rear of the houses fronting George Street and rear of the
houses fronting Herbert Street. For
these reasons the proposal is contrary to guidance provided by PPG1 and PPG3,
policy SP12/10 of the Structure Plan and policies BE2 and NE8 of The Cambridge
Local Plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17
No: C/00/0754/FP
Site: Cambridge
Airport, Newmarket Road, Cambridge
Proposal: Building
to house fuselage test rig (2500 sq metres) with access from Barnwell
Drive.
Applicant: Marshall
Aerospace Ltd
PSR: Under
the Public Speaking Rights adopted by the Council at meetings of the Subcommittee, Mrs Macbeth-Hornett, a local resident, spoke
on the application.
APPROVED delegated to the Director of Environment and Planning, subject to consultation with Chair and Spokesperson subject to the receipt of no objections to the development from the Airfield Safeguarding Authority, the satisfactory completion of a Section 106 Agreement to address potential problems with television reception, and the following conditions:
1.
Standard Time -
Full Permissions (CO1)
2.
Materials samples
(C11)
5. Cycle Parking (CO22)
8.
Landscaping details
- Full survey (C30)
11. Boundary Treatment (implementation before use
commences) (C37)
12. Floodlighting details (C38)
13. Details of planting implementation (Trees) (C53)
14. Replacement Trees and Shrubs (C54)
15. Tree Protection (C55)
16. Noise Insulation (C62)
20. Construction Hours (C63)
And the following
informative:
Section 106 obligation (AI04)
APPENDIX 1
SCHEME OF DELEGATION APPROVED ON 8 MARCH
2000 [see note1].
A Powers delegated to the Director of Planning, the Assistant
Director of Planning (Development Services), the Principal Development Control
Officers, and the Principal Planning Officer (Special Projects and Liaison):
1. The determination of, and the making of
decisions in connection with the determination of, all forms of planning and
other applications, and all forms of consent and other notifications (as set
out in the attached schedule) submitted under the Town and Country Planning Act
1990 and the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 except
for the following:
a) Major development comprising:
- 10 or more dwellings, or a site area of 0.5 ha. or more
where the number of dwellings is not shown [see note1].
- other developments where the floor space to be built is
1000 square metres (gross) or more, or where the site area is 0.5 ha. or more
in size.
b) Applications where the officer recommendation constitutes a
formal departure from Development Plan policies.
c) Applications - other than for householder development,
shopfronts, minor educational development of less than 1000 square metres
(gross), prior notifications, elevational alterations to existing buildings
or for advertisement consent - where approval is recommended by officers and
there are third party written objections on
planning grounds which cannot be overcome by a planning condition (s), or where
refusal is recommended by officers and there is third party written support on
planning grounds.
d) Applications for City Council Regulation 3 and 4 development
other than applications for householder development and other minor works.
e) Applications for the demolition of a listed building.
f) A resubmitted application which is identical to one
previously refused by officers under delegated powers.
g) Applications submitted by Members or officers of the City
Council, or by others on property in
which a Member or officer has a direct pecuniary interest.
h) Applications where, within 21 days of the date of
publication of the weekly list, or within 14 days of receipt of any subsequent
material amendment to the application, any
Member (including County Council Members representing City Wards)
requests in writing, or by E-mail sent in accordance with the Council=s guidelines, that the
application should be dealt with by the Planning Sub-Committee, stating the
planning grounds on which the request is based.
i) Applications requiring authorisation to enter into a S106
obligation [1].
j) Material amendments to
authorised S106 obligations [1].
2. The service of Planning Contravention Notices, Breach of
Condition Notices, Notice of Intended Entry, Section 215 Notices and
Requisitions for Information (subject to prior consultation with the Head of
Legal Services ).
3. Instructing the Head of Legal Services to issue
Discontinuance Notices for advertisements and to institute proceedings against
fly posting.
B Powers delegated to the Director of Planning, the Assistant
Director of Planning (Environmental Design and Conservation), the Principal
Planning Officers (Environmental Design and Conservation):
1. To determine all applications for works to trees under the Town
and Country Planning Act 1990, and for works to hedgerows under the Environment
Act 1995, except for the following:
a) where objections have been received to the course of action
proposed by officers and the objections cannot be resolved; or
b) Members request the matter to be referred to the Planning
Sub-Committee within the agreed timescale (14 days from notification).
2. To serve, and unless objections are received, confirm
Tree Preservation Orders and Hedgerow
Replacement Notices.
3. To instruct the Head of Legal Services to take enforcement
action or instigate proceedings under part viii of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990 relating to violations against protected trees, and under S97
of the Environment Act 1995 relating to violations against protected hedgerows.
4. To instruct the Head of Legal Services in the service of
Listed Building Enforcement notices under s.38 of the Planning (Listed
Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
5. To instruct the Head of Legal Services in the service of
notices requiring urgent works to unoccupied Listed Buildings under s.54 of the
Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
C Powers delegated to the Director of Planning, the Assistant
Director of Planning (Development Services), the Head of Building Control, the
Principal Building Control Surveyors:
1. To determine all Building Regulations applications, to issue
Notices and other consents under the Building Act 1984.
D Powers pursuant to a decision made by officers under
delegated powers, or a decision by a Council Committee, delegated to the Head
of Legal Services and other staff acting on his/her behalf:
(a) To represent the Council at any local inquiry or public
examination in respect of any structure or local plan or any amendment and
alteration thereof under part 11 Chapter 11 of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990 ("the Act"). [2]
(b) To make, issue and serve orders relating to the revocation and
modification of planning permission, and discontinuance orders, and to enter
into agreements under Part III of the Act and to represent the Council in any
proceedings thereto.
(c) To represent the Council in any proceedings relating to
compensation under Parts IV and V of the Act and in relation to any proceedings
concerning the rights of owners to require the purchase of interests in land
under Part IV of the Act.
(d) To make, issue and serve any notice or order and to initiate
civil or criminal proceedings under Parts VII and VIII of the Act in relation
to enforcement and special controls and to represent the Council in relation to
any proceedings relating thereto.
(e) To make, issue and serve any order or notice in relation to
the acquisition and appropriation of land for planning purposes, highways,
statutory undertakers under Parts IX, X and XI of the Act and to represent the
Council in any proceedings relating thereto.
(f) To represent the Council in relation to proceedings
questioning the validity of development plans, orders, decisions, directions
and notices under Part XII of the Act (including the right to initiate such
proceedings).
(g) To represent the Council in relation to public and local
inquiries and other hearings, to authorise any person to enter onto land, to
require information as to interest in land and to commence criminal proceedings
under Part XV of the Act.
(h) To make, issue and serve any order or notice, to initiate
civil or criminal proceedings, and to represent the Council in relation to any
proceedings (including public and local inquiries or other hearings) in
relation to the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation) Areas Act 1990 and
the Planning (Hazardous Substances) Act 1990.
Authority to represent the
Council in relation to any proceedings includes the right to instruct Counsel, subject to sufficient
funds being available in the Council's budget
to meet the
cost.
NOTE
[1] Change agreed 17/1/01 - Planning Sub Committee 17 January 2001 gave
approval for officers to enter into s.106 obligations on applications for up to
10 dwellings which would otherwise be dealt with under delegated powers, providing
the s.106 matter in question relates only to commuted sum contributions for
open space.
[2] Notwithstanding the
provisions contained within this Scheme of Delegation, officers will use their
discretion to refer any matter to the Sub-Committee for determination which in
their view raises contentious, sensitive or significant planning policy issues,
or where it would be otherwise beneficial for the decision to be made by
Members.
APPENDIX 2
SCHEDULE OF APPLICATIONS
AND OTHER FORMS OF CONSENT/NOTIFICATION REFERRED TO IN SECTION A OF THE
DELEGATED SCHEME
1. These shall include:
a) Outline and full planning permission and any subsequent pre-
and post-decision amendments;
b) Reserved matters following outline planning permission and
any pre- and post-decision amendments;
c) Renewals of planning permission and any pre- and
post-decision amendments;
d) Removal/variation of planning conditions;
e) Discharge of conditions
f) Advertisement consent;
g) Lawful Development Certificates;
h) Responses to County Council Regulation 3 applications;
i) Development by Government Departments under Circular 18/84
'Crown Land and Development';
j) Applications for Prior Notification;
k) Representations on applications for Goods Vehicle Operating
Licences;
l) Listed Building Consent;
m) Conservation Area Consent;
n) Responses to consultations from neighbouring local
authorities;
o) Screening and scoping opinions under the Town and Country
Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations
1999, or any subsequent amendment to those Regulations.
APPENDIX 3
GUIDANCE NOTE FOR MEMBERS ON REQUESTS TO
REFER PLANNING APPLICATIONS TO PLANNING
SUB-COMMITTEE
1. The
scheme of delegation for Planning Sub-Committee, in clause 1i), allows any
Member of the City Council and any County Member representing a City Ward to request
that an application be referred to the Sub-Committee for determination,
provided the request is made within the timescales set out, that it is in
writing, and that it states the planning grounds on which the request is made.
2. The
request can be made either because the Member wishes to make a representation
on their own behalf, or because they wish to support a representation(s) of one
or more of their constituents. Members
should state on what basis they are making the representation.
3. Every
City Council Member receives a paper copy of the Weekly List of planning
applications, which contains brief details of every planning application which
has been registered in the previous week, including the application reference
number and which planning case officer is dealing with it. The Weekly List is also available on the
Internet at the following address
(http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/services/planapps.htm). Occasionally, Ward Members will also be individually notified by
letter of a particularly significant application in their Ward.
4. Consultation,
including neighbour notification, will already be underway for those
applications on the Weekly List. People
have 21 days to make comments from the date of the notification letter. If
people are consulted on an
amendment to the application prior to a
decision being made, a further 14 days are normally given for comment.
5. Members
can inspect the plans at Planning Reception.
If they require more information they can contact the case officer.
6. Members
have two options:
a) To
make a representation on their own behalf, either in support of or against the
application;
b) To
make a representation on behalf of one or more of their constituents, either in
support of or against the application.
The case officer will assume that you have
no interest in the application unless they hear from you.
7. If
a Member wishes to make a representation, either on their own behalf, or on
behalf of a constituent(s), it must be
in writing (letter or e-mail) and it must state the planning grounds on which
the representation is based. If a
Member is uncertain about what the planning grounds might be they should speak
to the case officer. Typically,
planning grounds include: whether the development accords with planning policy;
whether the development is appropriate for the area; whether the development
would cause harm to neighbours= amenity; whether the proposal would cause
traffic congestion or be a danger to highway safety. Loss of property value, loss of trade to businesses and moral
objections are not planning grounds.
8. A
Member may also wish the application to be reported to Planning Sub-Committee
rather than be decided under officer delegated powers, particularly if they
have been contacted by a constituent objecting to an application. The Planning Department information leaflet
entitled >How To Comment=,
which accompanies the individual planning application notification letter sent
to neighbours, states that neighbours may wish to obtain the support of their
Ward Councillor in their representation.
This request must be in writing.
Before requesting that the application is reported to Committee, Members
are advised to check with the case officer what the officer recommendation is
likely to be, as the recommendation might accord with your views.
9. On
receipt of a written request by a Member for an application to be reported to
Planning Sub-Committee, the case officer will acknowledge the request in
writing or by telephone. The case
officer will also check with the Member that it is necessary for the
application to be reported to Committee, rather than be dealt with under
delegated powers.
10. Members= representations are summarised in the officer report and also attached
as an appendix to the Committee report.
11. Members
are entitled to attend Planning Sub-Committee and to request the Chair that they
should be allowed to speak.
G:\Committee\MINUTES\2001\010117j
(17 Jan 01).doc